By Nita Yadav
Published on:
Allahabad High Court (file photo).
The Allahabad High Court expressed surprise and suggested the decisions taken for the Junior Division Civil Judge and Fast Track Court District Judge in Mainpuri. He said both judges needed more training. The court made this comment while hearing the second appeal filed by Shailendra alias Shankar Verma in the High Court regarding the controversial property case.
Justice Kshitij Shailendra reviewed the decisions of the Mainpuri Civil Court involved in the second appeal civil case filed in the High Court. The High Court observed a clear lack of understanding by the Junior Division Civil Judge as to how to properly understand the defenses raised in the case.
The defense presented two witnesses
The High Court said it was surprising that the defense produced two witnesses whose testimony was not considered at all, indicating a possible lapse in the trial process. The court found that the civil court’s decision did not properly address the plaintiff’s claims or counterclaims, rendering the findings meaningless.
Failed to understand the procedure
The court held that as per the decision the case of the respondent was dismissed without due consideration of the arguments presented. Equally surprising was the performance of the District Judge of Room No. 2 of the Mainpuri Court, who failed to understand the proceedings properly.
Second appeal accepted for hearing
The High Court in its observations said that it appears that both the courts have failed to discharge their duties as civil courts. They are merely completing the formality of writing a decision without any proper reason. The High Court admitted the second appeal for further hearing and issued a notice to the opponents.
I am Nita Yadav, specializing in writing about politics and breaking national news. My focus is on delivering insightful and timely perspectives on these crucial topics, aiming to inform and engage my readers effectively.
